lib: sbi_ipi: Make .ipi_clear always target the current hart

All existing users of this operation target the current hart, and it
seems unlikely that a future user will need to clear the pending IPI
status of a remote hart. Simplify the logic by changing .ipi_clear (and
its wrapper sbi_ipi_raw_clear()) to always operate on the current hart.

This incidentally fixes a bug introduced in commit 78c667b6fc ("lib:
sbi: Prefer hartindex over hartid in IPI framework"), which changed the
.ipi_clear parameter from a hartid to a hart index, but failed to update
the warm_init functions to match.

Fixes: 78c667b6fc ("lib: sbi: Prefer hartindex over hartid in IPI framework")
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
This commit is contained in:
Samuel Holland
2024-10-25 11:59:46 -07:00
committed by Anup Patel
parent db8f03e512
commit be9752a071
5 changed files with 14 additions and 20 deletions

View File

@@ -45,24 +45,19 @@ static void mswi_ipi_send(u32 hart_index)
mswi->first_hartid]);
}
static void mswi_ipi_clear(u32 hart_index)
static void mswi_ipi_clear(void)
{
u32 *msip;
struct sbi_scratch *scratch;
struct sbi_scratch *scratch = sbi_scratch_thishart_ptr();
struct aclint_mswi_data *mswi;
scratch = sbi_hartindex_to_scratch(hart_index);
if (!scratch)
return;
mswi = mswi_get_hart_data_ptr(scratch);
if (!mswi)
return;
/* Clear ACLINT IPI */
msip = (void *)mswi->addr;
writel_relaxed(0, &msip[sbi_hartindex_to_hartid(hart_index) -
mswi->first_hartid]);
writel_relaxed(0, &msip[current_hartid() - mswi->first_hartid]);
}
static struct sbi_ipi_device aclint_mswi = {
@@ -74,7 +69,7 @@ static struct sbi_ipi_device aclint_mswi = {
int aclint_mswi_warm_init(void)
{
/* Clear IPI for current HART */
mswi_ipi_clear(current_hartindex());
mswi_ipi_clear();
return 0;
}