A platform can have multiple IPI devices (such as ACLINT MSWI,
AIA IMSIC, etc). Currently, OpenSBI rely on platform calling
the sbi_ipi_set_device() function in correct order and prefer
the first avaiable IPI device which is fragile.
Instead of the above, introduce IPI device rating and prefer
the highest rated IPI device. This further allows extending
the sbi_ipi_raw_clear() to clear all available IPI devices.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Tested-by: Nick Hu <nick.hu@sifive.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250904052410.546818-2-apatel@ventanamicro.com
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
sbi_ipi_init() expects the platform warm init function to clear IPIs
on the local hart, but there is already a generic function to do this.
After this change, none of the existing drivers need a warm init
callback.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
All existing users of this operation target the current hart, and it
seems unlikely that a future user will need to clear the pending IPI
status of a remote hart. Simplify the logic by changing .ipi_clear (and
its wrapper sbi_ipi_raw_clear()) to always operate on the current hart.
This incidentally fixes a bug introduced in commit 78c667b6fc ("lib:
sbi: Prefer hartindex over hartid in IPI framework"), which changed the
.ipi_clear parameter from a hartid to a hart index, but failed to update
the warm_init functions to match.
Fixes: 78c667b6fc ("lib: sbi: Prefer hartindex over hartid in IPI framework")
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Since commit 78c667b6fc ("lib: sbi: Prefer hartindex over hartid in
IPI framework"), The .ipi_clear callback functions take a hart index,
not a hartid. However, these warm_init functions were never updated.
Fixes: 78c667b6fc ("lib: sbi: Prefer hartindex over hartid in IPI framework")
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
The old scheme doesn't allow sending hart0 self-IPI as the
corresponding bit on pending register is hardwired to 0, this
could lead to unhandle IPIs on SMP systems, esp. on single-core.
Furthermore, the limitation of old scheme is 8-core, instead of
reserving source hart information, we assign bit (x + 1) as the
enable and pending bit of hartx, this also expands the bootable
hart number.
The following diagram shows the enable bits of the new scheme
on 32-core Andes platform.
Pending regs: 0x1000 x---0---0---0---0------0---0
Pending hart ID: 0 1 2 3 ... 30 31
Interrupt ID: 0 1 2 3 4 ... 31 32
| | | | | | |
Enable regs: 0x2000 x---1---0---0---0-...--0---0---> hart0
| | | | | | |
0x2080 x---0---1---0---0-...--0---0---> hart1
| | | | | | |
0x2100 x---0---0---1---0-...--0---0---> hart2
| | | | | | |
0x2180 x---0---0---0---1-...--0---0---> hart3
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
0x2f00 x---0---0---0---0-...--1---0---> hart30
| | | | | | |
0x2f80 x---0---0---0---0-...--0---1---> hart31
<-------- word 0 -------><--- word 1 --->
To send IPI to hart0, for example, another hart (including hart0
itself) will set bit 1 of first word on the pending register.
We also fix indentation in andes_plicsw.h along with this patch.
Fixes: ce7c490719 ("lib: utils/ipi: Add Andes fdt ipi driver support")
Signed-off-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: Yu Chien Peter Lin <peterlin@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: Randolph <randolph@andestech.com>
Reported-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Link: https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/opensbi/2023-October/005665.html
Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Tested-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Let us prefer hartindex over hartid in IPI framework which in-turn
forces IPI users to also prefer hartindex.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Move Andes PLICSW ipi device to fdt ipi framework, this patch is based
on Leo's modified IPI scheme on PLICSW.
Current IPI scheme uses bit 0 of pending reigster on PLICSW to send IPI
from hart 0 to hart 7, but bit 0 needs to be hardwired to 0 according
to spec. After some investigation, self-IPI seems to be seldom or never
used, so we re-order the IPI scheme to support 8 core platforms.
dts example (Quad-core AX45MP):
plicsw: interrupt-controller@e6400000 {
compatible = "andestech,plicsw";
reg = <0x00000000 0xe6400000 0x00000000 0x00400000>;
interrupts-extended = <&CPU0_intc 3
&CPU1_intc 3
&CPU2_intc 3
&CPU3_intc 3>;
interrupt-controller;
#address-cells = <2>;
#interrupt-cells = <2>;
};
Signed-off-by: Yu Chien Peter Lin <peterlin@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
