Currently, there are no barriers before or after the ipi_clear()
device callback which forces ipi_clear() device callback to always
use non-relaxed MMIO writes.
Instead of above, we use wmb() in after the ipi_clear() device
callback which pairs with the wmb() done before the ipi_send()
device callback. This also allows device ipi_clear() callback
to use relaxed MMIO writes.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reported-by: Bo Gan <ganboing@gmail.com>
Currently, we have a smp_wmb() between atomic_raw_set_bit() and
ipi_send() device callback whereas the MMIO writes done by the
device ipi_send() callback will also include a barrier.
We can avoid unnecessary/redundant barriers described above by
allowing relaxed MMIO writes in device ipi_send() callback. To
achieve this, we simply use wmb() instead of smp_wmb() before
calling device ipi_send().
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reported-by: Bo Gan <ganboing@gmail.com>
Let us prefer hartindex over hartid in IPI framework which in-turn
forces IPI users to also prefer hartindex.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
The cold_init() functions of ACLINT drivers should skip the HART
if sbi_hartid_to_scratch() returns NULL because we might be dealing
with a HART that is disabled in the device tree.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiang W <wxjstz@126.com>
Instead of using a global array indexed by hartid, we should use
scratch space to save per-HART MSWI pointer.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
The parameter checks in aclint_mswi_cold_init() don't guard against a
buffer overrun.
mswi_hartid2data is defined as an array of SBI_HARTMASK_MAX_BITS entries.
The current check allows
mswi->hart_count = ACLINT_MSWI_MAX_HARTS
mswi->first_hartid = SBI_HARTMASK_MAX_BITS - 1.
With these values mswi_hartid2data will be accessed at index
SBI_HARTMASK_MAX_BITS + SBI_HARTMASK_MAX_BITS - 2.
We have to check the sum of mswi->first_hartid and mswi->hart_count.
Furthermore mswi->hart_count = 0 would not make much sense.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1529705 ("Out-of-bounds write")
Fixes: 5a049fe1d6 ("lib: utils/ipi: Add ACLINT MSWI library")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiang W <wxjstz@126.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Currently, the ACLINT MSWI size check is forcing size to be at least
0x4000. This is inappropriate check because most systems will never
utilize full 16KB for a single ACLINT MSWI device so instead we should
check that ACLINT MSWI size is enough for on the associated HARTs.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Dong Du <Dd_nirvana@sjtu.edu.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We add common ACLINT MSWI library similar to the CLINT library
so that OpenSBI platforms can use it.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiang W <wxjstz@126.com>