Firmware/opensbi
8
0
Fork 0
forked from Mirrors/opensbi
Code Pull Requests Activity

lib: sbi: Prefer hartindex over hartid in IPI framework

Browse Source 
Let us prefer hartindex over hartid in IPI framework which in-turn
forces IPI users to also prefer hartindex.

Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
This commit is contained in:
Anup Patel
2023-09-01 17:41:07 +05:30
committed by Anup Patel
parent e632cd7c81
commit 78c667b6fc
9 changed files with 44 additions and 38 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
lib/sbi/sbi_tlb.c
View File

@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int tlb_update_cb(void *in, void *data)
static int tlb_update(struct sbi_scratch *scratch,
struct sbi_scratch *remote_scratch,
u32 remote_hartid, void *data)
u32 remote_hartindex, void *data)
{
int ret;
atomic_t *tlb_sync;
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static int tlb_update(struct sbi_scratch *scratch,
* If the request is to queue a tlb flush entry for itself
* then just do a local flush and return;
*/
if (remote_hartid == curr_hartid) {
if (sbi_hartindex_to_hartid(remote_hartindex) == curr_hartid) {
tinfo->local_fn(tinfo);
return SBI_IPI_UPDATE_BREAK;
}
@@ -375,8 +375,8 @@ static int tlb_update(struct sbi_scratch *scratch,
* this properly.
*/
tlb_process_once(scratch);
sbi_dprintf("hart%d: hart%d tlb fifo full\n",
curr_hartid, remote_hartid);
sbi_dprintf("hart%d: hart%d tlb fifo full\n", curr_hartid,
sbi_hartindex_to_hartid(remote_hartindex));
return SBI_IPI_UPDATE_RETRY;
}